Stein, DH; Schroeder, J; Hobson, NM; Gino, F; Norton, MI (2022) 'When Alterations Are Violations: Moral Outrage And Punishment In Response To (even Minor) Alterations To Rituals' , Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology
This page contains a summary table for data provenance for all studies in this paper.
In addition, authors can share with readers information on why they decided to retract or not retract, plans and/or results
for replication efforts, reflections on the process, or anything at all they feel is relevant. They may revise the information
provided as often as desired, and each author is free to present a message of their own, though authors are encouraged to speak
in one voice.
Aggregate responses
Wording of Question Answered by Co-Authors
Question 1: Data Collection Please indicate whether Francesca Gino was involved in
collecting the data for each study. For example, if the study was run on her
Qualtrics account, or she managed the (non-author) research assistant(s)
who ran the study, or she received the data provided by a third party. Please also provide
additional information for the subset of studies where she was involved.
Wording of Question Answered by Co-Authors
Question 2: Have you ever had access to the raw data?
By raw we mean exactly as it was collected. This can mean having
access to the Qualtrics data on the server, having physical copies
of paper-and-pencil files, having a dataset that was sent by a
third party, etc.
Wording of Question Answered by Co-Authors
Question 3: Do you have the data necessary to reproduce the published results?
Answer yes even if due to an error or some other reason the data you have do not actually
successfully reproduce the published results. It's OK not to post the data, it's OK to
post it only later, it's OK saying 'not sure' today and revising in the future.
Gino involved in data collection?
Co-authors have/had raw data?
Data for reproducing results available?
Study 1
No (2)
N/A (2)
N/A (2)
Study 2
No (2)
N/A (2)
N/A (2)
Study 3
No (2)
N/A (2)
N/A (2)
Study 4
No (2)
N/A (2)
N/A (2)
Study 5
No (2)
N/A (2)
N/A (2)
Individual Responses
Nicholas Hobson
This author did not provide information about this paper.
Michael Norton
Gino involved in data collection?
Co-authors have/had raw data?
Data for reproducing results available?
Study 1
No
--
--
Study 2
No
--
--
Study 3
No
--
--
Study 4
No
--
--
Study 5
No
--
--
Juliana Schroeder
Gino involved in data collection?
Co-authors have/had raw data?
Data for reproducing results available?
Study 1
No
--
--
Study 2
No
--
--
Study 3
No
--
--
Study 4
No
--
--
Study 5
No
--
--
Daniel Stein
This author has provided information for this paper but has not yet made it public
Below is a message written by author(s) of this paper. Keep in mind it may be modified at any time.
Written by: Juliana Schroeder Last update: 2023-11-07
We conducted an internal audit of this paper, which can be found here: https://osf.io/fw9ks.
- Francesca Gino was not involved in collecting or analyzing the data for any of the studies in the paper.
- The raw data and materials were found for all studies.
- There were no issues uncovered in the audit that would affect interpretation of results. We thus believe the findings from this paper are robust and can continue to be cited in the scientific literature.
This statement has been read and approved by the following authors: Daniel Stein, Juliana Schroeder, Nicholas Hobson, and Michael Norton.
Link to OSF website (with data and materials posted): https://osf.io/6kc3z/
