Living #18 | Many Co-Authors
Paper #18

Yeomans, M; Minson, J; Collins, H; Chen, F; Gino, F (2020) 'Conversational Receptiveness: Improving Engagement With Opposing Views' , Organizational Behavior And Human Decision Process  


This page contains a summary table for data provenance for all studies in this paper. In addition, authors can share with readers information on why they decided to retract or not retract, plans and/or results for replication efforts, reflections on the process, or anything at all they feel is relevant. They may revise the information provided as often as desired, and each author is free to present a message of their own, though authors are encouraged to speak in one voice.

Aggregate responses

Gino involved in data collection?
Co-authors have/had raw data?
Data for reproducing results available?
Study 1a No (4)
N/A (4)
N/A (4)
Study 1b No (4)
N/A (4)
N/A (4)
Study 2 No (4)
N/A (4)
N/A (4)
Study 3 No (4)
N/A (4)
N/A (4)
Study 4 No (4)
N/A (4)
N/A (4)

Individual Responses

Frances Chen
Gino involved in data collection? Co-authors have/had raw data? Data for reproducing results available?
Study 1aNo----
Study 1bNo----
Study 2No----
Study 3No----
Study 4No----


Hanne Collins
Gino involved in data collection? Co-authors have/had raw data? Data for reproducing results available?
Study 1aNo----
Study 1bNo----
Study 2No----
Study 3No----
Study 4No----


Julia Minson
Gino involved in data collection? Co-authors have/had raw data? Data for reproducing results available?
Study 1aNo----
Study 1bNo----
Study 2No----
Study 3No----
Study 4No----


Michael Yeomans
Gino involved in data collection? Co-authors have/had raw data? Data for reproducing results available?
Study 1aNo----
Study 1bNo----
Study 2No----
Study 3No----
Study 4No----



Below is a message written by author(s) of this paper. Keep in mind it may be modified at any time.
Written by: Michael Yeomans
Last update: 2023-11-07

We are conducting a full, independent audit confirming this paper is completely reproducible from raw data, that none of the data sources have been tampered with, and that all the results we report in the paper are correct. We will be able to confirm not only that Fran did not commit fraud on this paper, but that none of us did.

When the audit is finished and public we will put a link here. For now, this link points to the planning document:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UBH25ZmCxUnl1JVflKEQForlrKjc5zRgdbCaFDSo5X0/edit?usp=sharing

 

Additionally all the data and code for reproducing the results have been on OSF here: https://osf.io/2n59b/