Yeomans, M; Minson, J; Collins, H; Chen, F; Gino, F (2020) 'Conversational Receptiveness: Improving Engagement With Opposing Views' , Organizational Behavior And Human Decision Process
This page contains a summary table for data provenance for all studies in this paper.
In addition, authors can share with readers information on why they decided to retract or not retract, plans and/or results
for replication efforts, reflections on the process, or anything at all they feel is relevant. They may revise the information
provided as often as desired, and each author is free to present a message of their own, though authors are encouraged to speak
in one voice.
Aggregate responses
Wording of Question Answered by Co-Authors
Question 1: Data Collection Please indicate whether Francesca Gino was involved in
collecting the data for each study. For example, if the study was run on her
Qualtrics account, or she managed the (non-author) research assistant(s)
who ran the study, or she received the data provided by a third party. Please also provide
additional information for the subset of studies where she was involved.
Wording of Question Answered by Co-Authors
Question 2: Have you ever had access to the raw data?
By raw we mean exactly as it was collected. This can mean having
access to the Qualtrics data on the server, having physical copies
of paper-and-pencil files, having a dataset that was sent by a
third party, etc.
Wording of Question Answered by Co-Authors
Question 3: Do you have the data necessary to reproduce the published results?
Answer yes even if due to an error or some other reason the data you have do not actually
successfully reproduce the published results. It's OK not to post the data, it's OK to
post it only later, it's OK saying 'not sure' today and revising in the future.
Gino involved in data collection?
Co-authors have/had raw data?
Data for reproducing results available?
Study 1a
No (4)
N/A (4)
N/A (4)
Study 1b
No (4)
N/A (4)
N/A (4)
Study 2
No (4)
N/A (4)
N/A (4)
Study 3
No (4)
N/A (4)
N/A (4)
Study 4
No (4)
N/A (4)
N/A (4)
Individual Responses
Frances Chen
Gino involved in data collection?
Co-authors have/had raw data?
Data for reproducing results available?
Study 1a
No
--
--
Study 1b
No
--
--
Study 2
No
--
--
Study 3
No
--
--
Study 4
No
--
--
Hanne Collins
Gino involved in data collection?
Co-authors have/had raw data?
Data for reproducing results available?
Study 1a
No
--
--
Study 1b
No
--
--
Study 2
No
--
--
Study 3
No
--
--
Study 4
No
--
--
Julia Minson
Gino involved in data collection?
Co-authors have/had raw data?
Data for reproducing results available?
Study 1a
No
--
--
Study 1b
No
--
--
Study 2
No
--
--
Study 3
No
--
--
Study 4
No
--
--
Michael Yeomans
Gino involved in data collection?
Co-authors have/had raw data?
Data for reproducing results available?
Study 1a
No
--
--
Study 1b
No
--
--
Study 2
No
--
--
Study 3
No
--
--
Study 4
No
--
--
Below is a message written by author(s) of this paper. Keep in mind it may be modified at any time.
Written by: Michael Yeomans Last update: 2023-11-07
We are conducting a full, independent audit confirming this paper is completely reproducible from raw data, that none of the data sources have been tampered with, and that all the results we report in the paper are correct. We will be able to confirm not only that Fran did not commit fraud on this paper, but that none of us did.
When the audit is finished and public we will put a link here. For now, this link points to the planning document:
