| Gino involved in data collection? |
Co-authors have/had raw data? |
Data for reproducing results available? | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Study 1 | No (2) |
N/A (2) |
N/A (2) |
| Study 2 | No (2) |
N/A (2) |
N/A (2) |
| Study 3a | No (2) |
N/A (2) |
N/A (2) |
| Study 3b | No (2) |
N/A (2) |
N/A (2) |
| Gino involved in data collection? | Co-authors have/had raw data? | Data for reproducing results available? | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Study 1 | No | -- | -- |
| Study 2 | No | -- | -- |
| Study 3a | No | -- | -- |
| Study 3b | No | -- | -- |
| Gino involved in data collection? | Co-authors have/had raw data? | Data for reproducing results available? | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Study 1 | No | -- | -- |
| Study 2 | No | -- | -- |
| Study 3a | No | -- | -- |
| Study 3b | No | -- | -- |
Study 1 in the paper was run at the CLER lab in Harvard. We (Rellie Derfler-Rozin and Bradford Baker, at the time a UMD PhD student) have been in direct communication (after the email introduction made by Gino) with the lab manager at the time (Nathaniel Maddix) who ran the study as part of a bundle of studies. The study was conducted using our provided Qualtrics link under our UMD-based account. We have the original Qualtrics survey and original data is downloadable directly from our UMD based Qualtrics account. We collaborated the survey with Gino for the purpose of viewing it before running the study, but Gino never sent us any data and we are the ones who downloaded the data and analyzed it directly from Qualtrics. Based on advice from Simonson we also went back to the original Qualtrics to see under “data and results” whether any response/cells on Qualtrics have been altered (in which case a yellow marking would appear on a specific cell). No such case was detected.
Studies 2, 3a, 3b were collected using ROI Rocket (ClearVoice). Studies 2 and 3a were again collected using our UMD based Qualtrics accounts, and data were directly downloaded by us from Qualtrics, no data were sent from Gino. Original Qualtrics surveys are available on our Qualtrics accounts and data can be downloadable again. As with Study 1 we went through the surveys online to check whether there is any evidence that any cell was altered and found no evidence of such case. Study 3b that used T1 and T2 inter-connected surveys was conducted through the Qualtrics360 platform, and these surveys were not collaborated with Gino given the unique platform that only allowed us to share with UMD accounts (the credentials were shared with the person from ClearVoice so they can run our surveys). We still checked our original surveys to see if any cells were altered and found no evidence of such case.
For all the studies, materials (appendices), data, and syntaxes for the analyses (as well as elaborated regression tables for Studies 1, 2, and 3b) can be found online at: https://osf.io/twb9p/?view_only=c15f65bb4e5247ef9a855db97565d2fa.
Rellie Derfler-Rozin and Bradford Baker