Ruedy, NE; Moore, C; Gino, F; Schweitzer, ME (2013) 'The Cheater's High: The Unexpected Affective Benefits Of Unethical Behavior' , Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology
This page contains a summary table for data provenance for all studies in this paper.
In addition, authors can share with readers information on why they decided to retract or not retract, plans and/or results
for replication efforts, reflections on the process, or anything at all they feel is relevant. They may revise the information
provided as often as desired, and each author is free to present a message of their own, though authors are encouraged to speak
in one voice.
Aggregate responses
Wording of Question Answered by Co-Authors
Question 1: Data Collection Please indicate whether Francesca Gino was involved in
collecting the data for each study. For example, if the study was run on her
Qualtrics account, or she managed the (non-author) research assistant(s)
who ran the study, or she received the data provided by a third party. Please also provide
additional information for the subset of studies where she was involved.
Wording of Question Answered by Co-Authors
Question 2: Have you ever had access to the raw data?
By raw we mean exactly as it was collected. This can mean having
access to the Qualtrics data on the server, having physical copies
of paper-and-pencil files, having a dataset that was sent by a
third party, etc.
Wording of Question Answered by Co-Authors
Question 3: Do you have the data necessary to reproduce the published results?
Answer yes even if due to an error or some other reason the data you have do not actually
successfully reproduce the published results. It's OK not to post the data, it's OK to
post it only later, it's OK saying 'not sure' today and revising in the future.
Gino involved in data collection?
Co-authors have/had raw data?
Data for reproducing results available?
Study 1a
No (1)
N/A (1)
N/A (1)
Study 1b
No (1)
N/A (1)
N/A (1)
Study 2
No (1)
N/A (1)
N/A (1)
Study 3
No (1)
N/A (1)
N/A (1)
Study 4
Yes (1)
No (1)
No (1)
Study 5
No (1)
N/A (1)
N/A (1)
Individual Responses
Celia Moore
This author did not provide information about this paper.
Nicole Ruedy
This author did not provide information about this paper.
Maurice Schweitzer
Gino involved in data collection?
Co-authors have/had raw data?
Data for reproducing results available?
Study 1a
No
--
--
Study 1b
No
--
--
Study 2
No
--
--
Study 3
No
--
--
Study 4
Yes
Never
No
Study 5
No
--
--
Below is a message written by author(s) of this paper. Keep in mind it may be modified at any time.
Written by: Celia Moore Last update: 2024-05-12
Of the six studies in the published paper, the data for two were collected by Nicole Reudy. I have the data files from those studies, and analysed and wrote up their results for the paper. Three of the studies in the paper I collected the data for myself, and I have all those data files. There is one study in the paper for which I do not have the raw data (Study 4), which Francesca ran, and for which she provided the write-up. During the revision process, this study replaced a very similar study for which I do have the data. (I also have data from several other studies, not in the final publication, that confirm the primary finding of this paper in several different ways. Originally there was to be a second paper following from this work, in which we "dampened" the cheater's high. It was surprisingly hard to do!)
