Swift, SA; Moore, DA; Sharek, ZS; Gino, F (2013) 'Inflated Applicants: Attribution Errors In Performance Evaluation By Professionals' , Plos One
This page contains a summary table for data provenance for all studies in this paper.
In addition, authors can share with readers information on why they decided to retract or not retract, plans and/or results
for replication efforts, reflections on the process, or anything at all they feel is relevant. They may revise the information
provided as often as desired, and each author is free to present a message of their own, though authors are encouraged to speak
in one voice.
Aggregate responses
Wording of Question Answered by Co-Authors
Question 1: Data Collection Please indicate whether Francesca Gino was involved in
collecting the data for each study. For example, if the study was run on her
Qualtrics account, or she managed the (non-author) research assistant(s)
who ran the study, or she received the data provided by a third party. Please also provide
additional information for the subset of studies where she was involved.
Wording of Question Answered by Co-Authors
Question 2: Have you ever had access to the raw data?
By raw we mean exactly as it was collected. This can mean having
access to the Qualtrics data on the server, having physical copies
of paper-and-pencil files, having a dataset that was sent by a
third party, etc.
Wording of Question Answered by Co-Authors
Question 3: Do you have the data necessary to reproduce the published results?
Answer yes even if due to an error or some other reason the data you have do not actually
successfully reproduce the published results. It's OK not to post the data, it's OK to
post it only later, it's OK saying 'not sure' today and revising in the future.
Gino involved in data collection?
Co-authors have/had raw data?
Data for reproducing results available?
Study 1: Admissions professionals in the lab
No (1)
N/A (1)
N/A (1)
Study 2: Executives and promotion decisions
No (1)
N/A (1)
N/A (1)
Study 3: Selecting contestants
No (1)
N/A (1)
N/A (1)
Study 4: Actual admissions decisions
No (1)
N/A (1)
N/A (1)
Individual Responses
Don Moore
Gino involved in data collection?
Co-authors have/had raw data?
Data for reproducing results available?
Study 1: Admissions professionals in the lab
No
--
--
Study 2: Executives and promotion decisions
No
--
--
Study 3: Selecting contestants
No
--
--
Study 4: Actual admissions decisions
No
--
--
Zachariah Sharek
This author did not provide information about this paper.
Samuel Swift
This author did not provide information about this paper.
Below is a message written by author(s) of this paper. Keep in mind it may be modified at any time.
We have reviewed our records of data possession and control for the three studies published in the 2010 paper. Our records suggest that Gino did not collect or analyze data from any of the studies. We do not have reason to doubt the authenticity of the data.
